it could not have touch, which is indispensable. This is clear from what follows. An animal is a body
with soul in it: every body is tangible, i.e. perceptible by touch; hence necessarily, if an animal is to
survive, its body must have tactual sensation. All the other senses, e.g. smell, sight, hearing,
apprehend through media; but where there is immediate contact the animal, if it has no sensation,
will be unable to avoid some things and take others, and so will find it impossible to survive. That is
why taste also is a sort of touch; it is relative to nutriment, which is just tangible body; whereas
sound, colour, and odour are innutritious, and further neither grow nor decay. Hence it is that taste
also must be a sort of touch, because it is the sense for what is tangible and nutritious.
Both these senses, then, are indispensable to the animal, and it is clear that without touch it is
impossible for an animal to be. All the other senses subserve well-being and for that very reason
belong not to any and every kind of animal, but only to some, e.g. those capable of forward
movement must have them; for, if they are to survive, they must perceive not only by immediate
contact but also at a distance from the object. This will be possible if they can perceive through a
medium, the medium being affected and moved by the perceptible object, and the animal by the
medium. just as that which produces local movement causes a change extending to a certain point,
and that which gave an impulse causes another to produce a new impulse so that the movement
traverses a medium the first mover impelling without being impelled, the last moved being impelled
without impelling, while the medium (or media, for there are many) is both -- so is it also in the case
of alteration, except that the agent produces it [435a] without the patient's changing its place. Thus if
an object is dipped into wax, the movement goes on until submersion has taken place, and in stone
it goes no distance at all, while in water the disturbance goes far beyond the object dipped: in air the
disturbance is propagated farthest of all, the air acting and being acted upon, so long as it maintains
an unbroken unity. That is why in the case of reflection it is better, instead of saying that the sight
issues from the eye and is reflected, to say that the air, so long as it remains one, is affected by the
shape and colour. On a smooth surface the air possesses unity; hence it is that it in turn sets the
sight in motion, just as if the impression on the wax were transmitted as far as the wax extends.
Chapter 13
It is clear that the body of an animal cannot be simple, i.e. consist of one element such as fire or air.
For without touch it is impossible to have any other sense; for every body that has soul in it must, as
we have said, be capable of touch. All the other elements with the exception of earth can constitute
organs of sense, but all of them bring about perception only through something else, viz. through the
media. Touch takes place by direct contact with its objects, whence also its name. All the other
organs of sense, no doubt, perceive by contact, only the contact is mediate: touch alone perceives
by immediate contact. Consequently no animal body can consist of these other elements.
Nor can it consist solely of earth. For touch is as it were a mean between all tangible qualities, and
its organ is capable of receiving not only all the specific qualities which characterize earth, but also
the hot and the cold and all other tangible qualities whatsoever. That is why we have no [435b]
sensation by means of bones, hair, &c., because they consist of earth. So too plants, because they
consist of earth, have no sensation. Without touch there can be no other sense, and the organ of
touch cannot consist of earth or of any other single element.
It is evident, therefore, that the loss of this one sense alone must bring about the death of an animal.
For as on the one hand nothing which is not an animal can have this sense, so on the other it is the
only one which is indispensably necessary to what is an animal. This explains, further, the following
difference between the other senses and touch. In the case of all the others excess of intensity in
the qualities which they apprehend, i.e. excess of intensity in colour, sound, and smell, destroys not
the but only the organs of the sense (except incidentally, as when the sound is accompanied by an
impact or shock, or where through the objects of sight or of smell certain other things are set in
motion, which destroy by contact); flavour also destroys only in so far as it is at the same time
tangible. But excess of intensity in tangible qualities, e.g. heat, cold, or hardness, destroys the
animal itself. As in the case of every sensible quality excess destroys the organ, so here what is
tangible destroys touch, which is the essential mark of life; for it has been shown that without touch
it is impossible for an animal to be. That is why excess in intensity of tangible qualities destroys not
merely the organ, but the animal itself, because this is the only sense which it must have.
All the other senses are necessary to animals, as we have said, not for their being, but for their well-
being. Such, e.g. is sight, which, since it lives in air or water, or generally in what is pellucid, it must
have in order to see, and taste because of what is pleasant or painful to it, in order that it may