persons who were fled out of other families; so that in all it was computed that about
200,000 people were fled and gone. But of this I shall speak again. But I mention it here on
this account, namely, that it was a rule with those who had thus two houses in their keeping
or care, that if anybody was taken sick in a family, before the master of the family let the
examiners or any other officer know of it, he immediately would send all the rest of his
family, whether children or servants, as it fell out to be, to such other house which he had so
in charge, and then giving notice of the sick person to the examiner, have a nurse or nurses
appointed, and have another person to be shut up in the house with them (which many for
money would do), so to take charge of the house in case the person should die.
This was, in many cases, the saving a whole family, who, if they had been shut up with
the sick person, would inevitably have perished. But, on the other hand, this was another of
the inconveniences of shutting up houses; for the apprehensions and terror of being shut up
made many run away with the rest of the family, who, though it was not publicly known,
and they were not quite sick, had yet the distemper upon them; and who, by having an
uninterrupted liberty to go about, but being obliged still to conceal their circumstances, or
perhaps not knowing it themselves, gave the distemper to others, and spread the infection in
a dreadful manner, as I shall explain further hereafter.
And here I may be able to make an observation or two of my own, which may be of use
hereafter to those into whose bands these may come, if they should ever see the like dreadful
visitation. (1) The infection generally came into the houses of the citizens by the means of
their servants, whom they were obliged to send up and down the streets for necessaries; that
is to say, for food or physic, to bakehouses, brew−houses, shops, and who going necessarily
through the streets into shops, markets, and the like, it was impossible but that they should,
one way or other, meet with distempered people, who conveyed the fatal breath into them,
and they brought it home to the families to which they belonged. (2) It was a great mistake
that such a great city as this had but one pest−house; for had there been, instead of one
pest−house − viz., beyond Bunhill Fields, where, at most, they could receive, perhaps, two
hundred or three hundred people − I say, had there, instead of that one, been several
pest−houses, every one able to contain a thousand people, without lying two in a bed, or two
beds in a room; and had every master of a family, as soon as any servant especially had been
taken sick in his house, been obliged to send them to the next pest−house, if they were
willing, as many were, and had the examiners done the like among the poor people when
any had been stricken with the infection; I say, had this been done where the people were
willing (not otherwise), and the houses not been shut, I am persuaded, and was all the while
of that opinion, that not so many, by several thousands, had died; for it was observed, and I
could give several instances within the compass of my own knowledge, where a servant had
been taken sick, and the family had either time to send him out or retire from the house and
leave the sick person, as I have said above, they had all been preserved; whereas when, upon
one or more sickening in a family, the house has been shut up, the whole family have
perished, and the bearers been obliged to go in to fetch out the dead bodies, not being able to
bring them to the door, and at last none left to do it.
Journal of the Plague Year, A
50