muscular physical examination. Detec-
tion of subclinical neurologic dys-
function may explain why Garnacho-
Montero and colleagues (1) reported a
prevalence of CIP (53%) twice that of
ICU-acquired weakness (25%) observed
by De Jonghe et al. (3) when using
bedside neuromuscular exam as the
clinical discriminator. Some studies
suggest that ICU-acquired weakness is
often a combined pathology involving
both muscle and nerve (4). If a thor-
ough physical examination provides
data as useful as the more complex testing
employed by Garnacho-Montero and col-
leagues (1), it would allow clinicians to be
attentive to ICU-acquired weakness without
requiring routine neurophysiologic testing
in all patients with sepsis.
In conclusion, we feel this study raises
important questions about the natural
history of ICU-acquired weakness that de-
serve further clarification. Advancing our
understanding of the long-term conse-
quences of sepsis is critical for us to prop-
erly plan for patients’ return to their
home and workplaces.
Naeem A. Ali, MD, James O’Brien, MD,
Stephen Hoffmann, MD, The Ohio
State University Medical Center, Co-
lumbus, OH
REFERENCES
1. Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R, Garcia-
Garmendia JL, et al: Effect of critical illness
polyneuropathy on the withdrawal from me-
chanical ventilation and the length of stay in
septic patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:349 –354
2. MacIntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW Jr, et al:
Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and
discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective
task force facilitated by the American College
of Chest Physicians; the American Association
for Respiratory Care; and the American Col-
lege of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 2001;
120(6 Suppl):375S–395S
3. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, et al:
Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: A
prospective multicenter study. Groupe de Re-
flexion et d’Etude des Neuromyopathies en
Reanimation. JAMA 2002; 288:2859–2867
4. Bednarik J, Lukas Z, Vondracek P: Critical
illness polyneuromyopathy: The electrophysi-
ological components of a complex entity. In-
tensive Care Med 2003; 29:1505–1514
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000170196.25242.E6
The authors reply:
We appreciate the interesting com-
ments expressed by Dr. Ali and colleagues
regarding our recent contribution to
Critical Care Medicine. The main conclu-
sion of our study is that critical illness
polyneuropathy (CIP) significantly
lengthens the duration of mechanical
ventilation and is an independent risk
factor for weaning failure in a cohort of
critically ill septic patients (1). This find-
ing is in agreement with another recent
publication that reported similar results
in a heterogeneous cohort of mechani-
cally ventilated patients (2).
Apart from the presence of CIP, pro-
longed mechanical ventilation might be
due to other factors, such as the severity
of illness, the presence of co-morbidities,
or the total doses of sedatives adminis-
tered to the patients. These variables
were analyzed in our study, and we found
no differences between patients with CIP
and without CIP or between patients with
and without weaning failure according to
our reported definition. It is worth noting
that these variables were not recorded in
clinical trials comparing different wean-
ing modes, adding an extraordinary value
to our results. Obviously, prolonged me-
chanical ventilation can be explained by
the fact that the physicians in charge of
the patients were not blinded to the re-
sults of the neurophysiologic evaluation
(the investigator who performed all these
evaluations was unaware of the patient’s
medical condition). Nevertheless, daily,
the attending physicians assessed patient
readiness for liberation from mechanical
ventilation following an updated protocol
as it is done in clinical trials evaluating
different weaning approaches (3, 4).
It is true that more than half of the
deaths occurred after discharge from the
intensive care unit. This may be ex-
plained by the fact that these patients are
usually elderly patients with severe weak-
ness, which makes them extremely vul-
nerable in the post–intensive care unit
period (5). Interestingly, there is a lack of
information available in the medical lit-
erature about the evolution of patients
with CIP after being discharged from the
intensive care unit.
Finally, a very high rate of CIP has
been reported in adults with sepsis and
multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
Witt et al. (6) carried out the first pro-
spective study in a cohort of 43 patients
with sepsis and multiple organ dysfunc-
tion syndrome, and 70% of these patients
were diagnosed with CIP. Subsequent
prospective studies have reported a wide
prevalence (0–85%), depending on the
group of critically ill patients evaluated,
the timing of the electrophysiologic in-
vestigation, and the definitions used for
identifying neuropathy (7). Very recently,
clinically relevant paresis was found in
60% of the patients in the recovery of an
episode of acute respiratory distress syn-
drome. The neurophysiologic evaluation
was consistent with CIP in all except two
of these patients (8).
To summarize, there is compelling ev-
idence that CIP can influence the man-
agement and course of critically ill pa-
tients. In fact, mechanical ventilation is
prolonged by the development of this
neurologic complication. Because of the
harmful consequences that this may cause,
further studies are warranted to assess var-
ious interventions (different weaning strat-
egies, early tracheostomy, early use of non-
invasive after extubation) that could help to
improve patient outcome.
Jose Garnacho-Montero, MD, PhD,
Rosario Amaya-Villar, MD, Carlos
Ortiz-Leyba, MD, PhD, Intensive Care
Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del
Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
REFERENCES
1. Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R, García-
Garmendía JL, et al: Effect of critical illness
polyneuropathy on the withdrawal from me-
chanical ventilation and the length of stay in
septic patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:349 –354
2. De Jonghr B, Bastuji-Garin S, Sharshar T, et
al: Does ICU-acquired paresis lengthen wean-
ing from mechanical ventilation. Intensive
Care Med 2004; 30:1117–1121
3. Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, et al: A com-
parison of four methods of weaning patients
from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med
1995; 332:345–350
4. Esteban A, Alia I, Tobin MJ, et al: Effect of
spontaneous breathing trial duration on out-
come of attempts to discontinue mechanical
ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;
159:512–518
5. Garnacho-Montero J, Madrazo-Osuna J,
García Garmendia JL, et al: Critical illness
polyneuropathy: Risk factors and clinical con-
sequences. A cohort study in septic patients.
Intensive Care Med 2001; 27:1288 –1296
6. Witt NJ, Zochodne DW, Bolton CF, et al: Pe-
ripheral nerve function in sepsis and multiple
organ failure. Chest 1991; 99:176 –184
7. Garnacho-Montero J, Madrazo-Osuna J,
García Garmendia JL, et al: Neuromuscular
disorders of the critically ill patient. Clin Pulm
Med 2001; 8:354 –359
8. Bercker S, Weber-Carstens S, Deja M, et al:
Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy
in patients with acute respiratory syndrome.
Crit Care Med 2005; 33:711–715
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000170407.44717.89
1675Crit Care Med 2005 Vol. 33, No. 7