119
RENSHAW, A. A.; LEE, K. R.; GRANTER, S. R. Use of statistical analysis of
cytologic interpretation to determine the causes of interobserver disagreement
and in quality improvement. Cancer, New York, v. 81, p. 212-219, 1997.
ROBERSON, J.; CONNOLLY, K.; ST JOHN, K.; ELTOUM, I.; CHHIENG, D.
C. Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous
quality improvement project. Diagnostic Cytopathology, New York, v. 27, n. 3,
p. 181-4,set. 2002.
ROBERTSON, A.J.; ANDERSON, J.M.; BECK, J.S.; et al. Observer variability
in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. American Journal
of Clinical Pathology, Philadelphia, v. 42, p. 231-238, 1989.
RODRÍGUEZ, C.A.; CONEJOS, M.; MAGNONI, M.R. El Sistema
BETHESDA: una clasificación apropiada o una complicada propuesta a un
problema semántico en la evaluación citopatológica? Ciencia Médica, v. 6, n. 4,
p. 185-94, 1991.
ROHR, L.R. Quality assurance in gynecologic cytology. What is practical?
American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Philadelphia, v. 94, p. 754-758, 1990.
ROMBACH, J.J.; CRANENDONK, R.; VELTHIUS, F.J.J.M. Monitoring
laboratory performance by statistical analysis of rescreening cervical smears.
Acta Cytologica, Chicago, v. 31, n. 6, p. 887-894, 1987.
SAMINATHAN, T.; LAHOTI, C.; KANAN, V.; KLINE, T.S. Postmenopausal
squamous-cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge. Diagnostic Cytopathology, New
York, v. 11, p. 226-230, 1994.
SHIRATA, N. K.; PEREIRA, S. M. M.; CAVALIERE, M. J.; LONGATTO
FILHO, A; UTAGAWA, M. L.; SHIH, L. W.; SONG; MAEDA, M. Y. S.
Celularidade dos esfregaços cervicovaginais: importância em programas de
garantia de qualidade em citopatologia. Jornal Brasileiro de Ginecologia, Rio
de Janeiro, v. 108, n.3, p. 63-6, mar. 1998.
SILVA FILHO, A. M.; LONGATTO FILHO, A. Colo uterino & vagina.
Processos inflamatórios. Aspectos histológicos, citológicos e colposcópicos.
Rio de Janeiro: Livraria e editora Revinter Ltda, 2000.
SOMER, M.L.; WILLOCX, F.; van ROY, J. Standardized model for diagnosing
cervical carcinoma in situ based on the cytologic signs. Acta Cytologica,
Chicago, v. 31, n. 6, p. 878-882, 1987.
SOOST, H.J.; LANGE, H.J.; LEHMACHER, W. KULLMANN, B. R. The
validation of cervical cytology sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta
Cytologica, Chicago, v. 35, n. 1, p. 8-14, 1991.